A joint asset-owner and underwriter session on how quantified OT loss scenarios turn the renewal conversation from gut feel into evidence — and how to size coverage you can actually defend to your board.
Enter your details and we'll send you José & Rébiah's full deck from the Prague session.
We respect your inbox. No spam — just the deck and the occasional OT risk insight.
Inside the session
Two perspectives on the same problem — the asset owner who has to defend a renewal, and the underwriter who has to price the risk. The deck walks through the evidence that changes the conversation for both.
Why OT cyber coverage is still bought on instinct — sized by peer benchmarks, not actual loss exposure, with exclusions discovered after the claim.
The decision sequence that brings clarity: reduce what you can, retain what you can afford, and transfer only the residual tail risk.
How threat profile, asset exposure, business impact, and OT recovery combine into a financial loss scenario with a confidence range.
Ransomware on a DCS at an €800M manufacturer — built step by step from blast radius to a defensible total exposure figure.
From AXA XL: what creates friction, what underwriters ask for and rarely get, and what actually changes the pricing conversation.
Turning named loss scenarios into coverage limits and retention levels you can put in front of a board with evidence behind every number.
Who it's for
Slides, worked example, and the evidence checklist — straight to your inbox.
Download the presentation